← Back to Engineering
PROTOCOL: COLLAB-02

The Thinking Partner Handshake

Operational model for moving from "Vending Machine" prompting to "Sparring Partner" negotiation.

1. Interaction Modes

The system distinguishes between two distinct operational modes:

graph LR A[User Intent] --> B(Determine Mode) B -->|Low Stakes| C[Vending Machine] B -->|High Stakes| D[Thinking Partner] subgraph "Vending Machine" C --> E[Prompt: 'Do X'] E --> F[Output: X] end subgraph "Thinking Partner" D --> G[Prompt: 'Negotiate X'] G --> H[Output: Options A, B, C] H --> I[User Selection] I --> J[Final Output] end style D fill:#1d4ed8,stroke:#3b82f6 style C fill:#333,stroke:#666

2. The Cost function: "The Schlep"

Definition: The hidden labor of context management required to unlock Model 2 ("With") performance.

  • Input Cost: High (requires drafting specific constraints).
  • Output Variance: Low (deterministic quality).

3. Implementation: The Negotiation Prompt

Use this constraint block to force the system out of Autopilot.

📝 SYSTEM PROMPT: CRITICAL_EDITOR

ROLE: You are not a writer. You are a Critical Editor.
GOAL: Find logical gaps in my thesis.
CONSTRAINT: Do NOT generate the draft yet.
TASK:
1. Review input context.
2. Generate 3 structural outlines (Conservative, Aggressive, Contrarian).
3. Wait for User Selection.

STOP CONDITION: Pause after generating options.

4. Failure Modes

  • Vending Machine Fallacy: Expecting high-quality reasoning from zero-shot commands.
  • Context Drift: Failing to "prune" the context window, leading to hallucinated constraints.

See the System

I don't just write about this; I build the systems. Explore the actual codebase behind these insights.

View Athena-Public →
🤝

Work With Me

Stop drowning in complexity. Hire me to architect your AI systems and bionic workflows.

Book a Consultation →